32 minutes ago
- Copy link
The controversy has started due to the change of climax of the film by AI (Artificial Intelligence) in the re-district of the film Ranjhana. The director of the film Anand L. After Rai, the film’s lead actor Dhanush has also objected to this. The actor has said that despite his clear objections, the producer has re-respected the film with the changed climax.
Expressing displeasure over this, Dhanush has released an official statement saying, ‘The film Ranjhana, which was re-rested with the allied climax with AI, has completely disturbed me. This alternative ending has taken away its soul from this film and the party related to it continued it despite my clear objection. This is not the film from which I have been committed for the last 12 years. Changing film or content using AI is worrying for both artist and art. This is a threat to the integrity of cinema’s legacy and storytelling. I sincerely hope that strict rules will be made to prevent such practices in future.
With this statement, Dhanush wrote in the caption, ‘For the love of cinema.’
What is the whole matter?
The 2013 blockbuster film Ranjhana has been re-resurrected from 1 August under its Tamil Title Ambikapathi. However, the climax of this re-relief film has been completely changed with AI (Artificial Intelligence). While Kundan (Dhanush) dies in Climax in the real film, the new climax has seen the film’s happy ending.
Director also objected
The film’s director Anand L. Rai has enraged when the climax is changed. He has not only objected to this, but has reprimanded the production team for changes without permission. Anand L. Rai wrote from his official Instagram account, ‘The last three weeks have been very strange and deeply sad for me. Raanjhana, a film that originated from sensitivity, conflict, cooperation and creative risk, was replaced, re -packed and re -released without my knowledge or consent. This experience was very painful for me. And the thing that makes it even worse is that all this has been done with ease and carelessness. ‘
Further, the director wrote, ‘Nevertheless, the support and solidarity that got from the film industry, audience and creative community, reminded me that Raanjhana was finally about what, association, courage and truth. I am heartily grateful for this. I want to say it with full clarity- I do not support this AI-changed version of Raanjhana, nor accept it. It is completely unauthorized. I have no role in this. Nor of the team that made this film. This film was not just a project for us. It was made up of human hands, with human flaws and emotions. What is being broadcast now is not a tribute, it is an irresponsible grab, which completely destroys our work spirit. ‘
Anand further wrote, ‘The idea that a machine takes our work, change it, and present it in the name of innovation, it is very humiliating. Covering the emotional heritage of a film into an artificial cover is not a creative act, it is an open betrayal. I am speaking on behalf of all those who gave life to this film, writer, artist, musician, lyricist, editor, technician and the entire team. None of us were consulted. Nobody was heard. If Ranjhana had made you feel something, as it got us done, then please know that this version was changed by AI, this version does not reflect the true soul of that film nor is it the raanna made by us. ‘
The film Ranjhana was released in 2013.
Eros group cleaned
Pradeep Dwivedi, Chief Executive of Eros Media Group, who changed the film on this controversy, has said that this change is part of his company’s long -term creative and commercial vision. He said that if something can be improved by change, then why not be done.